Categories
Internet

Typefaces!

I saw this on the Apartment Therapy technology blog, Unpluggd.

Is this not the coolest thing ever?

I immediately emailed this to my bibliography professor, since we learned our typefaces or else in that class. Or at least I did. We weren’t allowed to use Times New Roman, and in our final projects part of the grade was based on our use of typefaces. You can see my choices here (PDF). (Though they are different from the original, since I did that on a Mac and I don’t have access to the exact fonts. I think the original was Baskerville Old Face, and this is Baskerville.)

If this image didn’t have so much going on, I think it would be my new computer desktop.

Categories
Internet Libraries

Social Media Phobia

This might be in the category of things that only bother me, but based on a small amount of anecdotal evidence, I don’t think I’m the only one afraid of social media.

Oh, I don’t mean the fear of being stalked or something similarly dramatic. I mean the mundane embarassment of other people knowing something intensely personal about you– and they know it about you because you, like a big dummy, plastered it all over the internet.

Here’s an example. I have a Last.fm account, but I’m not going to tell you anything more about it. It’s for me, and my Last.fm friends, to know about, and you to find out. Maybe. Anyway, if you’re not aware, Last.fm is a social utility for tracking the music you listen to on iTunes or similar. It alerts you to artists you might like, and matches you with people with similar tastes. All well and good, but if you occasionally listen to something that isn’t cool, as I frequently do, you have to face up to your friends knowing about it. Or, simply, turn off the tracking feature. I don’t think I’ve worried about this so much lately (maybe I got over myself some point in the last little while), but I do think about if it’s something particularly embarassing (perhaps British cozy murder mysteries written before 1950, just as an example).

Another example. My parents have a LibraryThing account–it’s unlimited, and they have a barcode scanner, thanks to a thoughtful birthday gift from their oldest child. They have a lot of books, and were using solely for the purpose of keeping a personal catalog of their books. LibraryThing, if you’re not aware, is a social book cataloging utility that… well, you get the idea. It puts your information out there, and que sera sera. Anyway, after their kind oldest child spent some hours putting in the more obscure theology books into LibraryThing, someone with very similar tastes requested to be friends with my parents. I asked them if they wanted me to accept the friend request, and they found it too weird to deal with. In fairness, I would probably think twice about being friends with someone with my parents’ book collection if that’s all I knew about them, particularly if only the north part of the library were cataloged yet (which is, I believe, the case).

In both these examples, the utility of the tool was the thing that drew the user, not the social aspect of it. I wanted a tool to track what I listened to most in a given week, and one that would allow me to learn about new artists. My parents wanted a way to keep track of their large book collection. However, the social aspect of the tool intruded itself, and made it, in some ways, less useful. This is in sharp contrast to something like Facebook, whose only utility is in its socialness. It’s not generational whether someone would choose a specifcally social tool over one that wasn’t– my mother-in-law happily uses Facebook.

I find this an important point in my thinking about “Library 2.0”. It’s not always the case that just because something can be made social that it ought to be made social. Sometimes people don’t really want to plaster their personal tastes and ideas out there for the world to see, even pseudonymously. I personally refused to tag any songs on Last.fm when I realized that this would mean giving up a lot of my internal relationship with music to the world. I’m more comfortable telling you what I’m reading, but I definitely don’t tell you everything I read. There’s a fine line, and many people are still learning where they are comfortable drawing it.

Categories
Libraries

Paging Dr. Librarian

This article got me thinking about problems that new MLS grads perpetually have–it can be incredibly difficult to land a full time professional job after graduating with a professional degree. Even if they got lots of experience during graduate school doing professional level work, it may not be taken seriously by the libraries at which they are applying. Just as likely, they didn’t get as much experience as they would have liked in graduate school. The suggestions commonly given are to move to a less desirable area of the country, or to take a part-time job. While both of those might work, it seems to me that both the new graduate and the library that hires them are put at a disadvantage.

In most professions which require a certain degree for entry, there are also certain standards about what practical experience the student should aquire before becoming a fully fledged member. Students fresh from medical school have internships, residencies, and perhaps additional fellowships which give them practical experience and further training. Law students have formal and standard internships throughout law school, must pass the bar exam, and then go into first year associate positions.

In those particular professions it’s a big deal when you screw up, so obviously supervised practical experience is more crucial before going out on your own. However, many librarians freely admit that they didn’t learn much of what they are doing in library school, and had to learn on the job. When that’s dealing with large budgets or doing public relations, screwing up can be a bigger deal than a reference interview not going so well. I know that I learned more practical librarian skills when I was working at a library, before and during graduate school, than I did in classes. What I learned in the my classes was important, too, but it was often more theoretical or required background knowledge. Medical students need anatomy courses which rely on paper or cadavers, but they also need to see actual live people to be able to treat them.

So employers of entry level librarians are aware that there will be a lot of on the job learning, and this may make them more or less willing to hire them. I found in interviews that some people didn’t  understand that I’d been doing supervised professional level paid work throughout graduate school, and so that some of my practical on the job training had been taken care of and I wasn’t quite as new as they thought. Every graduate school assistantship and internship varies quite a bit, and so it takes some selling to show off the skills acquired in that position. While that’s not a bad thing in itself, it would be more useful if graduate school experience could be standardized in such a way that employers could be confident that if you worked at such-and-such a program and got a good reccomendation, you are competent.

Alternatively, or perhaps in addition, having more standards about what librarians do in their first year out of school on the job would take away a lot of uncertainty on both ends. Post-MLS residency programs are becoming more common, and I think these should be expanded. In those, both the library and the new librarian are aware upfront of what they expect from each other, and also give them both a chance to change their minds. This is something like the academic world, where you might take a visiting assistant professor position or two before getting a tenure track position. Here’s the other thing–small town public libraries might be a good way to get a job, but a small town public library is a very specific type of institution. If you’re trying to build a different type of career, it won’t work for you.

Obviously this is pretty simplified, and there are many situations in which it would not work. Libraries who can’t afford to hire anything but entry level librarians couldn’t afford a residency program. And frankly, in the current economic climate, there are plenty of experienced people willing to work entry level jobs and wages. But if librarians want to be a profession, they might do well do adopt the habits of other professions.