Categories
Internet

Distraction Free Me

View what this post looked like in composition

This is my first time trying out a “distraction free” text editor. (WriteMonkey, in fact). Proponents of these tout the joy of older versions of word processors where your words took up the whole screen. Frankly, I wouldn’t want to use a word processor like that. What a pain. But a text editor is different. Sure, I’ll use Notepad to type up some quick notes about setup or tweak one teeny CSS thing. For more extensive coding I prefer Notepad++ or Dreamweaver (once upon a time I learned all the Dreamweaver HTML shortcuts, so I like to save time with that knowledge when it’s necessary). Doing a lot of extensive writing in a text editor designed for coding is awful. People who are all like “I wrote this whole book in XML” are not natural. Watching people work on command line Linux for a whole day make me want to cry.

At the other extreme, however, opening up a blank Microsoft Word document often takes more will to fill with creative writing or deep thought than I actually possess. I remember listening to a podcast one time where someone talked about working on a business plan, and said that he had started because he had saved a Word document. You hear similar things sometimes about Google Docs. In any event, for most things a full-fledged word processed document and its associated XML is unnecessary. If in the old days it would be a typewritten memo tacked up on the staff room bulletin board, it doesn’t truly need to be word processed and attached to a wiki in the new days. In the old days everyone had secretaries. Do they anymore?

Ultimately though, sometimes we just want to look at text in a pretty font and color, because this is more creatively appealing. I don’t personally feel that distraction free is ever possible as long as you are working on a comuter in an office. Distraction free is possible if you are working on a deserted island. Yet this does seem like something I could get used to for writing long form pieces. Or at least drafting them. As you might notice, the blog post version looks rather different than the initial composition. I am trying to train myself to write more than one draft of blog posts. More than two might do it even better.

A few points. Yes, this is mindless BS that keeps you from working on what you actually have to work on. But for me at least, this seemed to fill an important need. I write every single day on paper with a pen, usually about a page. This helps me crystallize ideas and perceptions, but almost never do these writings turn immediately into content. Second, producing a raw text file doesn’t help much when you have to add images and links and special formatting. Markdown helps with this, it’s pretty easy to learn, though I have as yet only learned two or three things. But after writing the initial draft, I exported the HTML and pasted it into WordPress for WYSIWYG laziness goodness. Note that once you get it into WordPress, you can toggle full screen editing mode for WordPress and then run the browser in full screen. Certainly you could compose the whole thing that way as well, but you wouldn’t get crazy colors of text or typewriter sounds or any of that eye candy.

Categories
Uncategorized

Midsummer catching up

At that point in the summer where it seems that it was just Memorial Day and now it’s the Fourth of July. What has happened?

In my case, mostly a lot of reading. I am working my way through all the books I learned about while at MIT 7, i.e. a lot of books sold at the MIT Press bookstore, and some other books people talked about at the conference.  But on the other hand, I’ve also been making many visits to the  new book shelf at my local public library and reading some fun books. I used to track what I was reading on my blog, now I mostly write it out on Goodreads. Here are some recent reads.

Margaret’s bookshelf: read

BossypantsGo the F**k to SleepHarry Potter and the Sorcerer's StoneGetting Things Done: The Art of Stress-Free ProductivityThe Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our BrainsThe Dyke and the Dybbuk

More of Margaret’s books »

Book recommendations, book reviews, quotes, book clubs, book trivia, book lists

The last few days I’ve been messing around with Google+ as a form of “professional development.” I doubt it will be a Facebook killer, to me it seems like it will be a nice supplement to Twitter. But that’s possibly because the only people I am following so far I also follow on Twitter.

I also bought some barefoot shoes. I doubt I will take up running, but I do think this will make hikes and packing sneakers for air travel more appealing. Reading about barefoot did make me wonder if it would be possible for me to become more athletic. There’s always been a lot of “no I can’t” or “that’s not for me”, but over the last year I’ve discovered that many of my assumptions about my capabilities and proclivities were wrong. Or, perhaps, to look at it another way, I started using my brain to think about things differently, which shaped my neural pathways into feeling more comfortable with something. Obviously there is both good and bad with this.

Will return to regularly scheduled content later.

 

Categories
Conferences Libraries

Electronic Resources and the READ Scale

When a patron has a problem with an electronic resource, what does he do? There are a few possibilities, and depending on where you work, one might be more likely than another. Maybe he visits the website that explains what to do. Maybe he contacts a librarian. Maybe he contacts the IT help desk (which I recently discovered is often what people do where I work). The experience in each case is different, but ultimately we want the patron to get his issue resolved in a timely fashion with a high level of satisfaction. Plus we would like to get some information for the future to improve the system or documentation.

At both Electronic Resources in Libraries and ACRL, I talked about my work trying to adapt the READ Scale to measuring the difficulty of electronic resource access issues. Basically this has taken the form of adding the READ Scale to a simple ticketing system, and then monitoring what types of questions I was spending my time answering. I want to make it easy for all the staff at the library to answer the lowest level questions, so that I can spend more of my time getting the highest level systems working well.

Slides from ER in L are posted below. They are also posted on Dominican’s institutional repository, but speaking of high level systems that need to work better… well, not the best for embedding automatically in blogs. You might also want to consult my handout for ACRL, which is rather similar to the ER in L handout but is online on someone else’s server, so why put it on any of mine?

If you want to know more about any of this, do get in touch with me. I am looking for potential research study participants.